Size Up’s: Necessary or Just Unnecessary Radio Traffic

While listening to some radio traffic from around the county I noticed a number of fire dept’s who give these long drawn out size-up’s and some who simply say they have a working fire or they don’t. My question to you is a size-up necessary or is it unnecessary radio traffic? If you deem it necessary tell why? Also who should give that size-up? If you find it unnecessary explain why also?

2 Comments

  • Jerry Swift says:

    A size up is critical especially when it is a structural incident. The size-up paints a picture for other responding companies so that they have an idea of what is immediately taking place. What should be identified in a size-up? The term “Working Fire” is old, worn out and useless. All it states is that something is burning with no details. Give me some details if i’m responding to assist you. Examples: Private Dwelling Fires- 99% of all private dwellings are wood frame. Keep it simple! Battalion 1 is on scene…heavy fire conditions on the number 2 of a 2-story private dwelling….command established -OR- Battalion 1 is on scene heavy smoke conditions throughout a single story private dwelling command established. That paints a short but well rounded picture of what I will be faced with when I get there. It shouldnt matter what the private dwelling looks like. “We” should already have an idea through a pre-plan or hazard risk assessment program. Commercial Incident: Battalion 1 is on scene heavy fire conditions throughout a one-story Type II building command established -OR- Battalion 1 is on scene with a moderate smoke condition from the 1st floor of a 3-story Type III building command established. Again, it shouldnt matter what the building looks like. “We” should have already conducted some type of pre-incident survey or target hazard assessment on our commercial occupancies. I have been involved in the fire-rescue service in an area of numerous structural incidents for the past 31 years. I hear good conditions reports and I have heard some really bad ones. Train yourself to get out of the habit of using the terms “working fire”, “at this time”, “Show” me this and “Show” me that. Those are the unecessary statements that prolong radio transmissions.

  • anchorpoint1 says:

    The size up IS important. A dissertation on conditions, Giving commands to every other company and broadcasting your every thought is a bit much. Yes, if there is something another company needs to know tell them. I’ll give an example of what I would consider a good size up or necessary.
    “L-2 has smoke showing 3rd floor of 3 story wood frame 20X30 .”
    Acknowledgment
    “L-2 has command”
    then if there is any extenuating circumstances
    “have L-1 & E-1 come in on Valence St, there’s construction on their end of the block.”
    Done and done.
    I don’t believe in broadcasting your every move, and in case this goes to court maybe a bit of ambiguity mixed with facts would make it easier to defend your actions.
    Just saying.
    Stay Safe.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

background image Blogger Img

Marques Bush

Firefighter Basics launched in February 2009 after Founder/Editor Marques Bush was looking for a way to express himself and share his experiences with brother and sister firefighters. Shortly after founding the site Marques spoke with several trusted friends and ask them to come on board and contribute also. Firefighter Basics is a dedicated group of firefighters who strive everyday to practice what they preach about Training, Safety, and Tradition.  We can be reached at firefighterbasics@gmail.com

FE Talk: Humpday Hangout

Comments
Aaron
Is This the Dumbing Down of the Fire Service?
As an old school firefighter i have seen the change in our job from gear to hud display on my mask to transmitting 12 leads by wifi to the hospital and its not the drivers or the young firefighters fault for not knowing "the other way" or the dumbing down of the fire service. Its…
2014-10-11 22:43:04
ladderjack
“Go” Versus “No-Go” A Brief Look into Survivability Profiling
Anthony, Thank you for your response. I hope I didn't come off as saying that "I am the only opinion that matters in this paper." I agree with you 100% that there is no "Set" way to do anything, and that we need to keep our minds open to different techniques and thinking outside of…
2014-08-27 20:34:16
Ryan McGovern/ Ladderjack
“Go” Versus “No-Go” A Brief Look into Survivability Profiling
Ben, Thanks a lot for your comment! You're definitely right that there needs to be hoseline protection given to the guys working above the fire; and that a TIC should be utilized when attempting VES techniques. Every little thing we can do and engineer to make an already dangerous maneuver safer is a must! Thanks…
2014-08-27 20:25:20
Anthony Correia
“Go” Versus “No-Go” A Brief Look into Survivability Profiling
While VSP was written as an EFO paper, the paper it is not end all be all on this topic. In a presentation Marsars did last year, he himself said it wasn't 100%. Even gave an example of a fire in his home local where a person lived, that would of met unlikely survivability profiling.…
2014-08-27 19:24:24
Ben Waller
“Go” Versus “No-Go” A Brief Look into Survivability Profiling
...OK, it was 3 points, but who is counting?
2014-08-26 23:44:08

Follow Firefighter Basics

FireEMS Blogs eNewsletter

Sign-up to receive our free monthly eNewsletter

LATEST FIREFIGHTER NEWS

HOT FORUM DISCUSSIONS

LATEST ON FIRE ENGINEERING

FEATURED DISCUSSIONS